A federal court in Maryland granted a foreign hotel franchisee’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction but denied a forum non conveniens motion in a personal injury case naming both franchisor and franchisee as defendants. Sant v. Marriott Int’l, 2023 WL 2213926 (D. Md. Feb. 24, 2023). Plaintiff John Sant sued Marriott and its franchisee Juhu Beach Resorts after being injured at a hotel in India. The defendants moved to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds, arguing that the matter should be decided in India. Marriot also moved to dismiss, arguing that it neither owned nor operated the property, and Juhu Beach Resorts moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.
The court granted Juhu Beach Resorts’ personal jurisdiction motion, finding that merely entering into the franchise agreement did not subject it to the court’s jurisdiction. The court denied the forum non conveniens motion, however, on the basis that substantial deference is due for a plaintiff’s choice of forum, and the court found no substantially greater convenience to parties and witnesses in proceedings based in India. Finally, the court denied Marriott’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, finding summary judgment a more appropriate stage for assessing Marriott’s degree of control over the hotel’s operations.
- Partner
Michael has nearly three decades of experience litigating on behalf of franchisors in federal and state courts across the country and in arbitration proceedings. His experience includes virtually every type of substantive claim ...
- Associate
Jason Johnson is a trial and appellate attorney who represents clients involved in civil litigation and arbitration. Jason focuses his practice on franchise litigation, including antitrust, class actions, unfair competition ...
The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
About this Publication
The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP.
To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here.