In CCF, LLC v. Pimental, 2013 R.I. Super. LEXIS 98 (R.I. Super. Ct. May 24, 2013), a Wendy’s franchisee in East Greenwich, Rhode Island, sued McDonald’s Corporation and a town official challenging the approval of various permits and approvals issued by the local planning board and zoning board that allowed for a McDonald’s drive-through restaurant across from the Wendy’s franchisee’s restaurant. On the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the court found for McDonald’s. It weighed whether the Wendy’s franchisee had standing to appeal the decisions of the planning board and the zoning board. Because Rhode Island’s statute does not define who is an aggrieved party to appeal a planning board’s decision, the court looked to other jurisdictions.
Concluding that courts in other jurisdictions have liberally interpreted an “aggrieved party” to include nearby tenants and property owners, the Rhode Island court held that the Wendy’s franchisee had standing to appeal the planning board’s decision. But the court dismissed the claim because the Wendy’s franchisee filed its appeal too late. On the appeal of the zoning board’s decision granting the drive-through, the court found for McDonald’s. The statute that applied to the zoning board’s decision specifically defined an aggrieved party to be a property owner. The Wendy’s franchisee did not have standing, according to the court, because it was only a lessee. The court granted summary judgment to McDonald’s.
- Partner
Maisa Frank represents clients in a variety of litigation matters. Whether conducting pre-dispute investigations, navigating litigation, or negotiating resolutions, Maisa’s advice and strategy is vital to clients facing ...
The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
About this Publication
The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP.
To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here.